Yeah, but EVs expose you to radiation…
- Gregory Andrews

- Apr 13
- 2 min read
Updated: Apr 13
I hear this one a lot. Usually delivered with a conspiratorial tone, as if electric vehicles drivers are trapped inside a microwave getting their brains fried. So let’s deal with it properly.
Yes - electric vehicles do produce electromagnetic fields (EMFs). So does your phone, your laptop, your TV, your fridge, your house wiring, your hair-dryer, and your electric toothbrush. If you’re worried about “radiation” from an EV, you should probably start by throwing your iPhone into the nearest river.
Because here’s the key point: the levels of EMF exposure inside EVs are well within established international safety guidelines. In many cases, they’re comparable to - or even lower than - what you experience in petrol cars which also have lots of electrical wiring.
There is no credible scientific evidence showing that EMF exposure from electric vehicles causes harm to human health. None. But here’s where this argument really falls apart. While people worry about hypothetical “radiation” from EVs, we are surrounded by a very real, very well-documented health threat: fossil fuel pollution.
Exhaust from petrol and diesel cars contains fine particulate matter and nitrogen oxides - pollutants that are directly linked to asthma, heart disease, stroke, and premature death. Globally, air pollution kills millions of people every year. In Australia, it contributes to thousands of deaths annually and is a huge burden on our health system.
That’s not a theory. That’s data and epidemiology.
So we’ve got a choice between a conspiracy theory that hasn’t been proven, and a real issue that’s killing people right now. But somehow, the conversation keeps getting dragged back to the hypothetical one. Why? Because arguments like “EV radiation” aren’t really about health or even EVs. They’re about climate change denial, distraction and delay. They’re about seeding doubt to justify sticking with the status quo.
Yeah, but what about the radiation?
Yeah, but what about the batteries?
Yeah, but what about the grid?
Individually, these questions might be worth answering. Collectively, they form a pattern: a rolling set of objections that move the goalposts just as solutions become viable. They’re about distraction and diversion. Because every minute we spend arguing about imaginary risks is a minute not dealing with the real one: a transport system built on burning fossil fuels, pumping pollution into our lungs, and heating the planet at the same time.
Electric vehicles aren’t perfect. Nothing is. But on the question of human health, they’re a massive improvement over internal combustion engines.
So next time you hear, “Yeah, but EVs expose you to radiation…”, just remember: You’re already carrying a far more powerful source of electromagnetic exposure in your pocket and regularly holding it up next to your brain.
The difference is, your phone isn’t killing the climate. Petrol cars are.





Next generation zinc battery technology will bring a huge advancement for EVs, phones, watches, etc. Zinc batteries have fire safety advantages over lithium. Zinc is much more readily available, non-toxic, highly recyclable and environmentally friendly. These batteries also hold charge much longer, allowing greater storage and staying power for EVs. Zinc batteries for EVs are not here yet but the claim is that these will provide charge for 12.4 million miles, well outlasting the rest of the car. I wonder how planned obsoletion will be factored in for something that just keeps working!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28tD_TAAPDU
Thanks Gregory for your clear and factual briefings like this. They are most useful in dispelling all the misinformaion out there.
An excellent informative article.