top of page

We’re Touching 1.9°C - And It’s Only 2025

  • Writer: Gregory Andrews
    Gregory Andrews
  • Oct 20
  • 2 min read

Updated: Oct 21

Real time data coming out of the world’s climate measurement systems should be stopping us in our tracks. The latest estimate by climate scientist Dr Karsten Haustein shows that, this week, the Earth is 1.9°C warmer than before humans began burning fossil fuels at scale.


Haustein’s work is widely respected in the field of climate science. A researcher at the University of Leipzig and formerly of Oxford’s Environmental Change Institute, he specialises in the modelling and attribution of extreme weather and climate trends. His website publishes daily maps showing global temperature anomalies drawn from the latest reanalysis and forecast data. They’re not political statements. They’re scientific observations and projections, grounded in the best available datasets.


The current map is shocking. It’s painted in deep reds across much of the Northern Hemisphere - the Arctic, Canada, Europe, Africa and Asia - with pockets of cooler blues too small to counterbalance the global warmth. Australia has a huge red blob too. The numbers are stark: a +1.766°C anomaly in the Northern Hemisphere, and +0.802°C in the Southern Hemisphere, producing a global mean of +1.284°C above 1981-2010. Since that 30-year period was already around 0.62°C warmer than the 1850-1900 pre-industrial average, the maths is simple but alarming. Add them together and you get 1.9°C above pre-industrial - this month, not decades from now!


A Glimpse of the Future - or the Present?


It’s true that this figure represents a short-term global anomaly, not a long-term average. But the fact that we are now brushing up against 1.9°C, even temporarily, shows how little room remains before the 2°C threshold that scientists and policymakers once considered a distant red line. It’s happening in real time. It’s being driven by the relentless accumulation of greenhouse gases.


When Haustein’s map is viewed in context, it’s more than a forecast - it’s a snapshot of a radically altered climate system. Polar amplification effects are visible. Continental heat extremes are becoming normal. And every new record pushes the boundary of what future models must consider “plausible”.


The world agreed in Paris to “pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C”. That line is already crossed. And as this latest analysis shows, 1.9°C is no longer theoretical. It’s within daily reach.


Where This Leaves Us


Numbers like these should jolt us, but they should also remind us of agency. We can’t undo the heat already baked into the system, but we can choose what happens next - whether these spikes become the new normal or remain warnings that we finally heed.


Karsten Haustein’s quietly published data tells a loud story. The planet is running a fever, and the thermometer is edging ever closer to levels that will reshape our civilisation. Pretending it’s not happening won’t cool it down. Acting swiftly and decisively just might.


ree

 
 
 

9 Comments


Couplebar
Oct 21

So why isn’t the ABC telling the public what’s actually happening? Are they afraid of alienating their drive to and drive home audiences? Why aren’t they interviewing you or these experts instead of giving platitudes that it’s OK until it’s too late. They man the microphones during a bushfire crisis, but seem incapable or unwilling to do similar for a climate crisis!! Admiring you advocacy, but think the horse has bolted!

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
Oct 22
Replying to

Thanks, Couplebar. And I hear your frustration. A lot of journalists care, but they’re stuck in tight formats, “both-sides” habits, and ratings anxiety. That doesn’t excuse soft coverage, but it helps explain it. Our ABC isn't what it used to be.

What we can do, right now:

  • Feed them stories: short, local, human angles (heatwaves, smoke, bills, solutions that work).

  • Name experts: tag scientists, fire chiefs, health voices, and link their work.

  • Ask for segments: write to producers with a three-line pitch and a phone number.

  • Reward courage: thank outlets when they do it well; share those pieces widely.

  • Back independents: subscribe/support climate-literate media so editors see demand.

I’ll keep pushing calm, clear, evidence-based pieces they can lift straight into…

Like

Geoff Thomas, wind@iig.com.au
Oct 20

Hi Gregory, it reminds me of a re-build I did, - this was in the nineties, ( long before modern companies realised that Solar panels contain excellent glass, top level aluminium, and last for 10,000 years crystals, - I was asked to save a

solar system that bp had totally lost, (yes, I know I am a designer, but designers can repair as well, if not better,) - it was on Christmas Island - the one on the equator, - lots of islands, oodles of interesting people, all below 1 metre above sea level, the system was for a group of nuns, (they were still making them, - Christmas island nuns - and very innovative and hard working local peopl…


Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
Oct 22
Replying to

Geoff, what a cracking story — thank you. Christmas Island, nuns, dead BP panels turned into windows, tiles and then bulwarks against rising seas… that’s circular thinking with salt on it. I love the “right angle to slow water and catch sand” detail - simple, local engineering that actually works. You’ve also nailed the bigger point: there’s almost always a second life for good materials if we slow down and think. (With the usual safety caveats - secure edges, no sharp glass exposure, and care around old wiring.) Your tale is a great reminder that resilience isn’t just tech; it’s ingenuity + community.

Please do share your wind thoughts - and if you’re happy for me to reference your solar-panel…

Like

Pretzelcat
Oct 20

1.9C in 2025. It's statistics like this that I just want to quit my job and live the high life. I do all I can to reduce my carbon foot print in my household and go to rallies, write to pollies but they're deaf to the people, all ears to big Corp (Woodside approval WTF!) and most people don't seem to care. It doesn't come up in conversation either because it's probably too depressing or just not real enough to people. And really that's the point. People cry out when the big bush fires happen or there is a 'unprecedented' flood. But shortly after there is silence. Why aren't we all in the streets protesting? When it becomes so bad…

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
Oct 22
Replying to

Totally get it, Pretzelcat. That mix of fury and “what’s-the-point” fatigue is real! Take a breather when you need to, then aim your effort where it counts: join a local group, target your MP, and make one more person care (a real convo beats a thousand hot takes). Millions of imperfect people > a few perfect saints. You’re not alone. 💚

Like
bottom of page