top of page
Search

Yeah But… What About China’s and India’s Emissions?

  • Writer: Gregory Andrews
    Gregory Andrews
  • Jun 21
  • 2 min read

Updated: Jun 22

Let’s talk about China and India for the fifth post in my “Yeah But…” series where I dismantle common and lazy arguments used by climate denialsts. If you’re just joining, check out my earlier posts here.


So this is one of the biggest, broadest, and most misused: “Yeah but… what about China’s and India’s massive emissions?”. It usually goes like this: “Australia’s emissions are tiny. If China and India keep polluting, what difference does it make what we do?”


So let’s break that down - fact by fact.


1. China and India are acting on climate. Fast.


🔋 China is the world’s largest investor in renewable energy, building more wind and solar than the rest of the world combined. It dominates EV production, batteries, and clean tech innovation. And while yes, it still builds coal plants, it is also rapidly reducing coal as a share of its energy mix.


🌞 India has the fastest-growing solar market in the world and is aiming for 500 GW of non-fossil energy by 2030. That’s six times Australia’ total electricity generation capacity and ten times what we are producing in solar energy. India has slashed solar costs and installed capacity at breathtaking speed, even while managing extreme poverty and development pressures.


China and India are both doing more than many rich nations give them credit for.


2. Per person, Australia pollutes far more.


Let’s talk fairness. Australia has just 0.3% of the world’s population, but we’re consistently in the top three countries for per capita emissions. When you count our coal exports, it gets even worse - we’re the world’s second largest exporter of emissions and one of the biggest climate polluters on the planet.


China’s per capita emissions are lower than Australia’s, and India’s are a fraction of ours. So when we say, “what about them?” we’re actually deflecting from our own outsized role in the crisis.


3. Leadership matters - especially from wealthy countries.


If every country waited for someone else to act, nothing would ever happen. But more than that: the world expects wealthy, developed countries like Australia - which have benefited from a century of fossil-fuelled growth - to lead the transition. We have the wealth, the technology, and the responsibility to do so.


Saying we won’t act until China and India do is like saying you won’t stop littering until everyone else cleans up their rubbish. It’s childish, self-defeating - and morally indefensible.


4. Climate change is a global problem. There’s no opt-out.


The climate doesn’t care where carbon is emitted - it all heats the same planet. We’re in this together. The only path forward is global cooperation, mutual effort, and leadership at every level. And that includes us.


Bottom line:


China and India aren’t the excuse we think they are. They’re building a clean energy future. And we should be too.


Let’s stop using other countries as an excuse to do nothing. Let’s lead, not lag. And let’s stop pretending that our relatively small population gives us a free pass on a global crisis.


What “Yeah But…” should I do next?


  • “Yeah But… We’ve Always Had Fires and Floods”

  • “Yeah But… Net Zero is a Scam”

  • “Yeah But… It’s Too Expensive”


Drop me a comment or message to let me know.


 
 
 

21 Comments


Alastair
Jun 23

well written greg. i’m familiar with all these arguements and have been for a decade but i struggle to summarise them as succinctly and briefly as you have!

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
Jun 23
Replying to

Thanks Alastair. I appreciate your feedback. I'm really enjoying writing this series.

Like

Bob Simon
Jun 21

Another great article Gregory that is exposing the lies and excuses of our Federal, State Governments, local and overseas fossil fuel industries.


Right now, like China, it looks quite likely that we will all be burnt to a cinder or washed away or both.

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
Jun 21
Replying to

👍🏽

Like

Graeme
Jun 21

Totally agree Gregory.

These countries put us to shame on the pace of renewable energy.

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
Jun 21
Replying to

😀👍🏽

Like

Guest
Jun 21

Agree 100%. China and India are improving out of sight, and Australia is the lagard.

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
Jun 21
Replying to

🔋⚡️🌞

Like

Phil
Jun 21

I know this sounds like not much jn the scheme of things, but following some painful dental work I had to find some food that I could manage and that would be a stomach liner for taking anti-inflamatory meds. Ah, Coles Pikelets! At $2.50 for 8. MADE IN NEW ZEALAND. Later the pain meant repeating the process, Aldi Pikelets, $2.29 for 8. MADE IN AUSTRALIA. Seriously folks, I'm all in favour of global trade and our New Zealand friends are like family to us all, but at what cost to the planet. How did economics start dictating that it was better to import a "fresh" product from New Zealand rather than just getting it made here. Those pikelets didn’t jus…

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
Jun 23
Replying to

Thanks for this well-considered response Alastair.

You're absolutely right: when it comes to emissions, skipping the pikelets won’t solve the climate crisis. It’s SUVs, air travel, gas cooktops, fossil power, and meat-heavy diets that dominate our individual and collective carbon footprints. And I totally agree — we need systemic changes like mandatory embedded emissions labelling and accountability for corporate climate deception.

But I’d gently push back on the idea that individual purchasing choices are meaningless. They may be trivial in terms of tonnage, but they’re not trivial when it comes to shifting culture — especially if they spark conversations, highlight contradictions, and build public support for the very reforms you’ve outlined.

Phil's comment wasn’t about demonising pikelets or blaming consumers.…

Like
bottom of page