top of page

Tied to the Titanic: Australia’s US Delusion Is Sinking Fast

  • Writer: Gregory Andrews
    Gregory Andrews
  • Jan 4
  • 3 min read

The world just watched the most powerful nation on Earth launch a full-scale military attack - without UN Security Council approval, without any domestic legal justification, and with no plausible self-defense claim. Simply because it can. That’s exactly what happened when the United States struck Venezuela and captured President Nicolás Maduro in a military operation that has drawn condemnation worldwide.


It wasn’t a limited strike. It was a major military assault involving aircraft and bombings across Caracas. It was the most direct US military intervention in Latin America since Panama was invaded in 1989.  The UN Secretary-General warned it sets a dangerous precedent of undermining international law.


None of this is a defence of Maduro or his regime which has been brutal, corrupt, and repressive. The point is that the world has rules for dealing with ‘baddies’, and those rules don’t include bombing and taking over a country, abducting a head of state, and helping yourself to another country’s resources - especially when plenty of other repressive regimes somehow never face that treatment.


And here’s another sickening truth: US bombs targeted the mausoleum where former Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez was laid to rest - obliterating his remains and a site of national significance. That’s not collateral damage; that’s a symbol of disrespect for sovereignty and international norms.


What Was the Real Motive?


The Trump White House didn’t even deny it. In public statements and interviews, Trump said that after the military capture of Maduro the US would “run” Venezuela and rebuild its vast oil industry.  According to multiple reports, major US oil companies are already preparing to invest billions of dollars in Venezuelan oil infrastructure, which has some of the largest proven crude reserves in the world.


That’s not ideological liberation rhetoric. That’s economic conquest by another name.


A Rule-Breaking Superpower


International law is clear: the UN Charter prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, except in self-defense or with Security Council authorisation. No such authorisation existed. No credible self-defense justification was presented. What occurred was, by legal experts’ assessment, a violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter. It was an illegal act of aggression.


And that’s precisely the point: the under the Trump Regime, the US now publicly makes the rules, and then breaks them when convenient.


So let’s be brutally honest: what the world is seeing now - the kidnapping of a sitting head of state, the bombing of sovereign territory, the razing of a national symbol - is not an anomaly. It’s a dangerous pattern.


This is Australia’s Titanic Moment


For decades, Australian leaders have tied our strategic identity to the US. We’re investing hundreds of billions into AUKUS submarines. Much of that money is going straight into US ship building industries. We seem to be deriding or ignoring diplomatic alternatives, pushing deeper into a dangerous security relationship that demands more from us. And our Defence and Foreign Ministers are insisting that shared “values” still bind Canberra and Washington. What planet are they on?!


So here’s the uncomfortable analogy that has to be made:


Australia is pinning its future to a ship that’s ripping up the rule book and sailing us towards catastrophe. We’re like passengers demanding deck chairs on the Titanic.


What Should Australia Do Now?


I’ve been writing for over a year about how Australia needs to find new friends. If we continue to act as a vassal, then we’re making a profound strategic error.


So-called “shared values” aren’t earned by rhetoric. They have to be shown by consistent behaviour. Right now, the US’s conduct in Venezuela reveals a superpower and regime that respects no one’s interests but it’s own.


Australia must recognise that reality, not romanticise an alliance that’s a lifeline tethered to a sinking ship. It’s time to wake up. Before we go down with the Titanic too.


The US is no longer the friend or ally it once was. Time for Australia to wake up and jump ship.
The US is no longer the friend or ally it once was. Time for Australia to wake up and jump ship.

 
 
 

20 Comments


Tinito
4 days ago

I think that's looking at only one side. How about the side of the Venezuelan people? Who actually are celebrating in their millions since that's actually not their leader, atleast not the one they elected.


One wonders, who is supposed to come to their aid? The whole world should watch on as they suffer, they're killed and mistreated and millions are even forced to leave their homeland. And the whole international community including the UN just sits back and watches.


Merely condemning a dictator like that doesn't do anyone any favours!


I come from Uganda and we have a president who has been in power for 40 years and is up for re-election this month. He has killed everyone who…


Like

Brian
Jan 04

Spot on. High time our government spoke out strongly against Trump’s outrageous actions.

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
6 days ago
Replying to

Thanks Brian. I agree. Clear, principled leadership matters here. Speaking out isn’t about anti-Americanism; it’s about standing up for international law and Australia’s long-term interests.

Like

Guest
Jan 03

Western leaders may well have had their concerns about the President of Venezuela and, like Albo, may well be urging diplomacy to prevent escalation, but they have all been completely gutless, like Albo, in not condemning what was clearly an illegal act of aggression. It would appear to be the case that “the people with their hands on the steering wheel of the fate of our species are a bunch of sociopathic thugs who can smash and rob any country they please with total impunity” Quote attributed to Caitlin Johnstone.

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
6 days ago
Replying to

I totally understand and feel the same frustration behind that reaction. Whatever one thinks of the Venezuelan government, this was a serious breach of international norms but the Trump Regime, and the reluctance of Western leaders - including Australia's - to say so clearly is deeply concerning. Condemnation isn’t incompatible with diplomacy. In fact, without it, diplomacy loses credibility. Especially among so-called friends.

Like

Perri
Jan 03

I also think that we should become more strategically independent. But I don’t think that the vast majority of people really know what this means. Even without the AUKIS submarines, a lot of our equipment purchases are from the US. This is because they make some of the best battle-tested equipment. Look what happened when we purchased European helicopters.

If we want to be strategically independent, we need to vastly increase defence expenditure—two to three times what it is now. We need to develop our own military-I district complex and pay for it. If we don’t want to bankrupt the country, we need to vastly decrease things like the NDIS and reduce all sorts of welfare payments. We will need…

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
6 days ago
Replying to

Perri, I don’t agree with that characterisation and I also believe it's unfair. Focusing narrowly on income tax and poorer people ignores the bigger picture - wealth, capital gains, multinational profit-shifting and fossil fuel subsidies. Many highly profitable corporations, including massive fossil fuel companies like Chevron, pay little or no tax in Australia and receive substantial public support through diesel and other subsidies. Much more than Centrelink payments from low income Aussies.

Like

el_gallo_azul
Jan 03

Aw. The USA is all grown up! Even though it has an elected monarch rather than a hereditary one, it now does what Australia's Mother Country - the United Kingdom - did for hundreds of years.

Like
Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
6 days ago
Replying to

There’s a strong historical echo there. Great powers often start believing the rules apply to everyone else once they reach a certain point. The question for Australia isn’t nostalgia or analogy, but whether tying ourselves to that behaviour still serves our interests in today’s world. I know it doesn't.

Like
bottom of page