top of page

LNP Abolishing its Own Policies: Angus Taylor’s Climate Backflip

Writer: Gregory Andrews
Gregory Andrews
18 hours ago
3 min read

The Coalition has just unveiled what it calls its new energy policy. But read the measures and it's difficult to describe this as just an energy policy. It's a plan to dismantle the majority of Australia’s existing climate action framework.


Angus Taylor says he would repeal the Climate Change Act, remove the legislated net-zero target, abolish the Safeguard Mechanism, repeal the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard, revoke offshore wind zones, and remove federal prohibitions on nuclear power. Now what makes this announcement particularly remarkable is that most of the policies he's proposing to abolish were created, adopted or supported by previous Coalition governments.


Angus Taylor says he will “scrap net zero”. But back in October 2021, it was him and Scott Morrison who jointly announced Australia’s commitment to reach net zero by 2050. Labor later put that target into law through the Climate Change Act 2022, but the commitment itself was adopted by the Morrison LNP government. Five years later, Taylor is promising to remove it from Australian law.


That's not just a reversal of existing Labor policy. It's a repudiation of a central climate commitment made by the last Coalition government!


Then there is the Safeguard Mechanism, which the Coalition now describes as a “carbon tax on business” and promises to abolish. The problem with that rhetoric is again simple: the Coalition created it.


The mechanism commenced in 2016 under the Coalition and placed emissions baselines on Australia’s largest industrial facilities. Labor strengthened it in 2023 by requiring covered facilities to progressively reduce emissions. There are legitimate debates about offsets, industry impacts and how quickly emissions should fall. But it's deceitful to pretend the basic architecture is a radical Labor invention.


Taylor is also proposing to repeal Australia’s New Vehicle Efficiency Standard. Despite all the rhetoric, the standard doesn't ban utes or force Aussies to buy electric vehicles. It sets efficiency targets for manufacturers, encouraging a greater supply of cleaner and more efficient vehicles for consumers to choose from.


On renewables, Taylor is proposing to revoke four offshore wind zones and shift energy policy towards more coal and gas, while also lifting the nuclear prohibition. In his own words, the Coalition would keep coal generators operating “as long and hard as possible”, and expand coal, gas and oil production.


Taylor says his priority is affordability and reliability. Yes, Australians care about power bills, industry costs and whether the lights stay on. But the Coalition's claims should be tested against evidence. AEMO’s 2026 Integrated System Plan concluded that renewables connected by transmission, firmed by storage and backed by gas remain the least-cost pathway for the National Electricity Market as coal generators retire. CSIRO’s 2026 GenCost report reached a similar conclusion about the cost competitiveness of renewables supported by storage. Renewables are cheaper than coal or nuclear, so how can replacing them with coal and nuclear reduce costs?!


Australia’s National Climate Risk Assessment warns that climate change is increasing risks from heat, fire, floods, sea-level rise, infrastructure damage, health impacts and economic losses. Those risks don't disappear because a politcial party decides to rename climate policy as energy policy, and emissions don't stop warming the atmosphere because politicians declare that Australia has “done its bit” - again, Angus Taylor's words.


This is why the announcement matters beyond individual policies. Over several LNP governments, Australia slowly assembled a climate-policy framework. It was inconsistent, inadequate and repeatedly fought over, but pieces of that framework were nevertheless built.

 

The Howard government legislated laws containing nuclear prohibition. Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull introduced the Safeguard Mechanism. Scott Morrison, with Angus Taylor as the responsible minister, committed Australia to net zero by 2050. Labor then legislated that commitment, strengthened the safeguard system, introduced vehicle-efficiency standards and accelerated renewables.

 

The Coalition now proposes reversing most of that architecture. Its own policy could hardly be clearer: scrap net zero, scrap the Safeguard Mechanism, keep coal operating longer, expand gas and oil development and lift the nuclear ban.


Abolishing climate action and calling it an “energy policy” doesn't make the climate consequences disappear. But it does take the LNP one more step closer to One Nation and Trump in terms of its commitment to Australia's future safety and prosperity.


 
 
 

6 Comments


Perri
17 hours ago

The fact the LNP is now going against previous LNP policies is a key reason why conservative voters are flocking to One Nation - not because of love of Pauline Hanson, but a deep dissatisfaction with the LNP in having any policy they think will get them votes, rather than basing policies on sound principles.


As for which energy system is cheaper, I won’t debate the vast problems with the CSIRO and AEMO publishings, but I will note that, logically, if solar and wind were so good and cheap (they aren’t the same thing), we would have switched to them several decades ago. And the lack of planning by government agencies has meant that it is likely that transition to…

Like
Nico
11 hours ago
Replying to

Research into bringing bringing solar from space to the earth really kicked off in 1973, when looking for alternative energy after the oil crisis.

It saw a race Australian scientists beat NASA to develop the technology we are using now.


Fast forward to Hormuz, they are now cheaper than alternatives but it took them time to be deployed at scale to achieve that point. Coal hasn’t changed much and doesn’t follow the same technological curve.


Batteries are following the same curve as solar but with delays. In the past year they largely eaten gas peaking share in the evening.


Last year renewable energy overtook coal energy globally for the first time (https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-review-2026/)

So it’s not just an Aussie thing.

And…

Like

Robert Hinkley
18 hours ago

The Coalition really is the Gang that Couldn't Shoot Straight (soory for the New York reference). They haven't a clue on climate. They're just trying to find a policy that will atrract voters who hate the people who have been right about climate all along. "Vote For Us Because We Hate Environmentalists Too." It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic. Don't they see where Trump is leading politicians in the US who think this way? Right off the proverbial mid-terms cliff.

Like
bottom of page