"Recyclable" Doesn't Mean "Recycled"
- Gregory Andrews

- Dec 10, 2025
- 2 min read
The comforting story we tell ourselves - and the landfill reality
How often do you hear “but it’s recyclable”?. I hear it in supermarkets, road-side service centres and worksites. Someone holds up a plastic cup or bottle, taps the little triangle, and presents it like a diplomatic passport: This item may pass without further question.
Now don’t get me wrong - I’m not saying “stop using your recycling bin”. Keep recycling what you can. I’m saying we’ve been sold a comforting story. I’m arguing against the myth that a label on a packet equals a real-world outcome. Because here's the harsh truth, that triangle is largely doing emotional work, not material work. It's greenwashing and tricking us into thinking everything is OK when it's not.
The Australian Government's own plastics data shows most of what we throw into our recycling bins ends up in landfill! Australia consumes over 4.0 million tonnes of plastic, each year and over three quarters of that is disposable stuff like plastic bottles. But we recover less than 500,000 tonnes each year - so our actual recycling rate is less than 13%.
Let that settle. We are not “recycling plastic.” We are mostly landfilling plastic, with a thin slice diverted. So, yes, you can keep sorting your rigid containers at home. But if you’re doing that while buying more and more plastic, you’re basically running faster on a treadmill.
Australia has plastics recycling targets that Ministers like to throw around. But here's the thing: they're not being met. Australia’s National Packaging Targets (set back in 2018) include the big one everyone quotes: 70% of plastic packaging recycled or composted by 2025. Reality check: it already is 2025! And the recycling rate is only 13%.
This is where “recyclable” becomes an even sneakier word. Something can be technically recyclable in a lab and on its label, but functionally unrecyclable once you add: real-world contamination, mixed polymers, missing collection systems, weak markets, pizza fat, snotty tissues and “I thought you could put soft plastics in the bin too!”
So what's the answer?
Here’s my version of honesty:
Stop pretending we can recycle our way out of this. We need laws that reduce plastic production. Not just better bins, better labels and better “consumer choices”. We need legislated phase-outs and standards that shrink the flood of disposable plastics in the first place.
Make producers carry the cost. Not through voluntary, warm and fuzzy “we’re all in this together” pledges, but through enforceable extended producer responsibility, recycled-content requirements, and design standards that eliminate unrecyclable composites and unnecessary packaging.
Stop using “recyclable” as a marketing claim without proof. Australia’s consumer law already prohibits misleading conduct; the ACCC has issued guidance on environmental claims and greenwashing for exactly this reason.
And for everyday Aussies, a rule of thumb that keeps you sane: When you hear “But it’s recyclable,” quietly add the missing words: “…in theory.” Then ask the real question: Should this have been made from plastic in the first place? Do I really need it? Is there a non-disposable alternative?




Scientists were saying single use plastics should be banned decades ago.Plastic pollution is everywhere, it is as urgent as the climate emergency.
Any political parties fighting the war on plastic?
The container deposit scheme is a joke. In 2008 in SA it was raised from 5c to 10c. Whatever you bought for a dollar in 2008 will cost you $1.55 in 2025 according to the RBA. Here in Queensland employees of Coca-Cola Amatil (former or current) were members of the Containers for Change scheme. Any criticism of this issue resulted in a social media pile on which only stopped when I advised them that I had access to technology that could identify the individuals involved.
The amount per container is so small that most folks just bin them. Perhaps in a recycling bin, but at our club direct in the landfill skip. Seriously 10 cents wasn't much in 2008, but…
I work for a recycle pick up company collecting from private houses. I knew things were bad but this job has been a real eye opener. Only a few people are trying to to do the right thing and you just pick up a tiny bag of soft plastic and maybe some old clothes and e-waste, but the majority of people treat the pick up as a get of gaol free card. They have so much plastic waste and rubbish that the mind boggles, especially all that individually wrapped lunch box stuff. I think if individuals can find an excuse or pass the buck they mostly do. It is a sad state of affairs and the only solution is for…
Putting a 10c refund on ALL plastic containers - dish washing, laundry, oil, milk etc, etc - could be a good way to boost the process. There are many people who go through household recycle bins looking for the cans and bottles of soft drinks and beer to get the 10 cents that other people can't be bothered with. Perhaps when half of the products that are put in the bin are worth quite a bit of money there will be a greater incentive.
Plastics present us with a complex problem because they are 'essential' in so many aspects of modern life. It may be that the best thing is to make ONLY recyclable plastics and for manufacturers to shoulder…
Plastics are an unnecessary nightmare. Contamination during collection is the main excuse used for not processing them.
We forget that the first plastics ever made were produced from cellulose from plants and trees, or best of all hemp. Remember the cellophane we put on homemade jam jars? It is 100% biodegradable, we could easily be manufacturing biodegradable plastics from renewable plant sources like hemp and not use petroleum at all.
The ultimate responsibility is with the government, if they actually cared, with the stroke of a pen, the EPA could ban most of the harder to recycle plastic sticks from use thus making recycling much easier simpler and cheaper. the additional costs would be minuscule compared to the costs we…